<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free market environmentalism, property rights, and rational cost-benefit analyses</title>
	<link>http://5views.com/2008/04/22/free-market-environmentalism-property-rights-and-rational-cost-benefit-analyses/</link>
	<description>Right-Blogging Tacoma/Pierce/Puget Sound/Washington</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mofo from the Hood</title>
		<link>http://5views.com/2008/04/22/free-market-environmentalism-property-rights-and-rational-cost-benefit-analyses/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Mofo from the Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://5views.com/2008/04/22/free-market-environmentalism-property-rights-and-rational-cost-benefit-analyses/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>A Global Warming paradigm as a means to build political careers and for use as a basis for governments to formulate policies for social control?

There is nothing new under the sun. 

We all want to have faith in our leaders to guide and govern us on the basis of truth. In return, we pledge to guard that truth. 

Is there any truth in the Global Warming paradigm worth guarding, worth dying for?

I think it might be best if the United States could set the world standard for environmental policies, as opposed to China for instance. 

But how can the U.S. sustain its position as a world leader if its citizens are impeded by questionable taxation and economic policies by which the rest of the world doesn't conduct itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Global Warming paradigm as a means to build political careers and for use as a basis for governments to formulate policies for social control?</p>
<p>There is nothing new under the sun. </p>
<p>We all want to have faith in our leaders to guide and govern us on the basis of truth. In return, we pledge to guard that truth. </p>
<p>Is there any truth in the Global Warming paradigm worth guarding, worth dying for?</p>
<p>I think it might be best if the United States could set the world standard for environmental policies, as opposed to China for instance. </p>
<p>But how can the U.S. sustain its position as a world leader if its citizens are impeded by questionable taxation and economic policies by which the rest of the world doesn&#8217;t conduct itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
