Running in your sleep

March 9th, 2009 by Republican By Default

I have a dog that kicks in her sleep when she’s probably dreaming that she’s running.  It’s kinda cute until it happens at 4 am.  She sleeps on the bed so I get kicked.  She barks in her sleep, too.  Also cute most of the time.

But as you can see from this video, it can also be dangerous and disconcerting for a dog.  Maybe we need to get some money from the stimulus package to research this problem and find a cure.

Barry’s economy

March 7th, 2009 by Republican By Default

Share photos on twitter with Twitpic

h/t MichelleMalkin.com

NYT almost admits to their dirty politics

February 19th, 2009 by Republican By Default

From NewsBusters.Org:

It is quite sad that it takes a lawsuit for the New York Times to at least sort of admit their wrong doing in publishing the disgrace to professional journalism that article is. And it is maddening that their pseudo-apology falls well short of what is required for this kind of egregious assault on reporting. Not to mention that it seems to take a lawsuit to make the New York Times print an editorial contrary to their opinion.

Recently the NYT stock price fell below the price of their Sunday edition.  When will they learn.

No wonder newspapers want a bailout.  The Democrat party should pay for their advertising (cleverly hidden in supposed news articles.)

Dirty politics take time and money to clean up

February 18th, 2009 by Republican By Default

The Public Disclosure Commission, responsible for investigating violations of the state’s campaign laws, has dismissed a claim that Bruce Dammeier (R-Puyallup) had violated ‘in-kind’ disclosure laws.  The problem is that it wasted tax dollars to investigate this unsubstantiated claim and probably confused some voters needlessly.  As usual, it appears to be nothing more than dirty politics.

It always amazes me that it’s Democrats who usually make these false claims which never stick, while at the same time they dismiss substantiated allegations.  Want some examples?
Read the rest of this entry »

Protest the “Friday the 13th Spending Bill” on President’s Day; Update: Pics ‘n stuff

February 15th, 2009 by Republican By Default

It’s the only name that seems to fit.  I’ve heard it called the ’swindulus’ package, the ‘porkulus’ package and the ’spendulus’ package.  No matter what you call it, it’s a bad idea.  And now you too can protest this irresponsible legislation.

Monday (tomorrow) on President’s Day in Seattle there will be a protest against the Friday the 13th Spending Bill (that’s the day it was in conference and reached its final form.) a.k.a. the “Obama Stimulus Package” (written by Nancy Pelosi and friends.)

Here’s the announcement:

IT’S ON!! PRESIDENT’S DAY PROTEST AT WESTLAKE PARK IN SEATTLE!

The protest against the porkulus is on for President’s Day!

Date: Monday, February 16th
Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Where: Westlake Park in downtown Seattle, 401 Pine St., in the open area by the big arch.

The idea is to use what we’ve learned about dissent over the last eight years. We need loud protests with lots noise and visuals. So, what should you bring?

Bring AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN! Bring your families, your friends, neighbors, bring everyone!

Bring SIGNS!! Get those craft making juices flowing and make signs and banners and pictures and paintings. Just imagine that you are a left-wing college student with nothing else to do and that should help you get started!

Bring something to sit on and appropriate clothing.

Most importantly, JUST BRING IT!!!

More info (PROTEST UPDATE -NEW!):

Great news! Steve Beren, the man who tried to take on radical lefty Jim McDermott, will be a speaker at the protest rally! I am in the process of trying to find more speakers, including economists from the list of those that signed that letter published by the Cato Institute.

Let’s see what happens!!

Stay tuned…

NEW UPDATE:

1. I will be on KIRO News tonight on the 5:00 news talking about our protest.
2. The speakers will start around 12:30pm to accommodate those people who can only come during their lunch hour, so get there earlier rather than later!

Stay tuned for more!!

Another post from Liberty Belle:

More Reasons to Attend the Protest on Monday

This really is for the children.  It’s irresponsible to saddle them with debt that resulted from the mistakes of people that we elected (and when I say ‘we’ I’m actually just being polite since I didn’t do anything to elect Clinton or Greenspan).  The next generation should be left to decide for themselves how much debt they deserve and can handle.

But for all of my ‘fans’ out there, I’m sorry to disappoint but I won’t be attending the rally.  I have a prior commitment.   If not for that I would be there.

Update:

From the Boston Tea Party to your neighborhood pork protest
A Protest for the Rest of Us
Seattle’s Stimulus Bill Protest
Signs of the day
So, so proud - happy, satisfied, tired, RILED UP!!!

The real cost of the so-called ’stimulus’ bill

February 12th, 2009 by Republican By Default

There are two very important facts left out of the calculation that supposedly ends with the $789 Billion price tag on the spending package just passed by congress.

Those facts are:

  • Debt financing is not included in that number
  • Congress will never cut spending from these levels to the pet projects that were included in it

The Heritage Foundation has more accurate numbers posted on it’s blog.  The numbers are based on figures from the Congressional Budget Office.

The true expected cost: $3.27 Trillion dollars.  And that’s a preliminary figure based on extending out only 20 of the most popular spending items.

There are some other things to think about when considering just how much these numbers can still rise.  Debt financing costs could rise.  There are other programs and projects that are not calculated with the assumption that they will never by cut.

Debt financing numbers ($744 B) are based on current rates paid by the US Governmen, mostly for Treasury Bills.  However, because the world economy is slowing there will be less money available to borrow, so the government will have to raise the rates that it pays on these instruments to attract investment.  The biggest example of this is China, which has been buying up T-Bills for years.

Congratulations Democrat voters.  You have just succeeded in saddling the next generation with an impossible debt burden.

Is my congressman dirty?

February 12th, 2009 by Republican By Default

It seems that Norm Dicks has received $59,500 in campaign contributions from a defense lobbyist group that, in turn, received about $100 million in defense contracts for it’s clients

In case you hadn’t guessed already, I didn’t vote for him.  It does remind me of one of the funniest campaign stickers I’ve ever seen.  Someone tore off the ‘rm’ from one of his stickers and slapped it on the sidewalk at the Freedom Fair.

Since Dicks is a Democrat there will likely be nothing that becomes of this fact.  However, if he were a Republican you can bet he’d be investigated by every government agency with even the remotest interest in such things.

It’s kind of like Barry signing an executive order restricting the hiring of lobbyists, then turning around and filing for numerous exceptions to his own rules.  I’m guessing you didn’t hear much about it.  The media like to keep the facts about Barry quiet, just like they do for any other Democrat.  Republicans, of course, receive no such special treatment in the media.

Dicks among beneficiaries of suspect lobbyist firm

Another point to note about this story is that the congressman at the center of this investigation is none other than ABSCAM-bribe-recipient-caught-on-tape John Murtha.  Has anyone heard if he’s going to be prosecuted for accepting that bribe?  Oh, wait.  My mistake.  He’s a Democrat.

So where are all of the people who screamed about Dick Cheney and his former ties to a defense contractor.  All I hear are crickets chirping from that gallery.  No surprise there either.

The Octuplet’s Mom

February 11th, 2009 by Republican By Default

I just finished watching the Dateline interview of the Octuplet’s mom.  My opinion of this woman has grown tremendously.  My opinion of the interviewer, Ann Curry, has diminished significantly, which I didn’t think was possible considering how low it was to before the interview.

In the interview this new mom came across as a caring, confident, faithful and loving individual. The interviewer came across as a nasty, bitter, condescending, self-righteous… (I’ll let you finish that sentence).
This mother is driven by her love for her children.  She has a tremendous task ahead of her but it’s clear that she will do everything in her power to rise to the occasion.

To put this ‘debate’ in context, let me compare her to a woman who ‘chooses’ to kill her baby before it’s born.  Would Ann Curry have asked a woman who chose to take the life of her unborn baby how that is not selfish?  Would she have condescendingly implied that it was irresponsible as she did with this mother who chose life for her children.

It’s amazing to me that only the death of an unborn baby is considered ‘choice’, but when a mother chooses life for her unborn baby it’s criticized as irresponsible and selfish.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!  (KJV)

The embodiment of liberal commenters

February 9th, 2009 by Republican By Default

There’s a guy I run into once in a while that has come to illustrate to me the mentality of liberal commenters.  He’s made so many ridiculous statements that I can only laugh at how much he resembles the liberal commenters that have visited this site.

I just wanted to take a moment to thank this person for confirming to me that I made the right choice in limiting comments to registered users.

I have to make a few simple changes to the site to manage registration and comments.  As soon as that is done I’ll make the opportunity available to begin commenting.  Of course, that opportunity will only be available to thinking people who don’t spew liberal or Democrat talking points.  I don’t mind engaging in debate, but I’m not going to waste any more time with senseless dimbulbs.

I also want to thank the one or two people who actually engaged in intelligent discourse on this site over the last year.   You know who you are.  You’ll be welcomed if you choose to come back.  As for the rest.  I’m sorry to say that I honestly feel that talking with you was a waste of time.  You were neither honest nor were you discussing the issue with the open mind that liberals usually claim to maintain.

I’m more convinced than ever that liberals have become everything they claim to despise about conservatives, especially religious conservatives.  This will likely be the subject of many upcoming posts.

Closing 5views.com to comments

February 7th, 2009 by Republican By Default

I’m sick and tired of wasting time dialoging with liberals and feeling obligated to respond to their stupid, ill-conceived, narrow-minded rantings.  So, I’m closing the site to unapproved commenters.

If you would like to be able to comment on this site, just send me an e-mail at ‘moderator’ at this site.

I haven’t read any of today’s comments, but I will likely just spam them rather than respond.

I wish I could say it’s been fun dialoging with dimbulbs, but it really hasn’t.  There have only been one or two people who have presented substantive arguments to posts on this site, so it’s largely been a waste of time.